← All comparisons

SendGrid vs Amazon SES

In-depth comparison of SendGrid and Amazon SES for B2B SaaS companies. We analyze pricing, deliverability, features, scale, and total cost of ownership.

Last updated: 2026-03-15. Verify current features, pricing, limits, and integrations on official vendor pages.

Short answer

SendGrid wins on ease of use, marketing features, managed deliverability, and integration ecosystem. Amazon SES wins on raw cost per email and unlimited scale. SendGrid is the better choice if you want a managed platform that works out of the box. SES is better if cost is your top priority and you have engineering resources to build infrastructure around it. Sequenzy is best for SaaS teams needing lifecycle email with native billing integration.

SendGrid

The managed email platform with marketing, transactional, and analytics

Amazon SES

The cheapest email infrastructure with AWS-scale capacity

Quick comparison

Decision area SendGrid Amazon SES What to verify
Best For Managed email with marketing and transactional Lowest cost at extreme scale on AWS Test this with representative data and the next realistic usage tier.
Cost at 100K emails/mo ~$90/mo ~$10/mo Test this with representative data and the next realistic usage tier.
Cost at 1M emails/mo ~$250/mo ~$100/mo Test this with representative data and the next realistic usage tier.
Setup Time 15-30 minutes 1-3 days (sandbox exit, DNS, IAM, SNS) Test this with representative data and the next realistic usage tier.
Marketing Campaigns Full campaign builder (add-on) Not available Test this with representative data and the next realistic usage tier.
Managed Deliverability Managed IPs, reputation, bounce handling DIY: you manage everything Test this with representative data and the next realistic usage tier.
SMTP Support Full SMTP relay Full SMTP interface Test this with representative data and the next realistic usage tier.
Dashboard Full analytics dashboard Basic SES console (CloudWatch for more) Test this with representative data and the next realistic usage tier.
Payment Integration None None Test this with representative data and the next realistic usage tier.
AWS Integration External service Native (IAM, Lambda, CloudWatch, SNS, S3) Test this with representative data and the next realistic usage tier.
Dedicated IP On Pro ($89.95/mo) $24.95/mo per IP Test this with representative data and the next realistic usage tier.

Feature comparison

Feature SendGrid Amazon SES
Send speed 8/10

Reliable with managed infrastructure

7/10

Variable, depends on region and quota

Template system 7/10

Dynamic templates with Handlebars and editor

4/10

Basic SES templates, limited

Bounce handling 8/10

Automatic suppression and management

4/10

Must build with SNS. No auto-suppression.

Scale capacity 9/10

Billions per month, proven

10/10

Virtually unlimited AWS capacity

Setup complexity 7/10

15-30 minutes with guided setup

3/10

Days: sandbox exit, IAM, DNS, SNS, bounce handling

Campaign builder 8/10

Full visual builder in Marketing Campaigns

0/10

Not available

Automation 6/10

Basic automation in marketing add-on

0/10

Not available

A/B testing 8/10

Subject line and content testing

0/10

Not available

Contact management 7/10

Lists with segmentation

0/10

No contact management

Scheduling 8/10

Campaign scheduling with timezone support

0/10

Not available

IP management 8/10

Managed shared and dedicated IPs

5/10

Shared by default, dedicated at $24.95/mo each

Reputation management 8/10

Platform manages for you

3/10

DIY: you monitor and manage reputation

Event notifications 7/10

Event webhooks with basic signing

5/10

SNS topics (complex setup required)

Compliance tools 9/10

Full CAN-SPAM, GDPR tools

5/10

Basic suppression. Build compliance yourself.

AWS integration 3/10

External service, API-based

10/10

Native IAM, Lambda, CloudWatch, SNS, S3

Dashboard 8/10

Full analytics dashboard with charts

4/10

Basic SES console, CloudWatch for more

Delivery tracking 8/10

Activity feed with search

5/10

Via CloudWatch and SNS (requires setup)

A/B test analytics 8/10

Statistical significance tracking

0/10

Not available

Export 8/10

CSV, scheduled reports, API

5/10

CloudWatch metrics, S3 event publishing

Revenue attribution 0/10

Not available

0/10

Not available

Billing integration 0/10

Not available

0/10

Not available

Lifecycle sequences 4/10

Basic automation in marketing add-on

0/10

Not available

Dunning emails 2/10

Build with API

0/10

Build everything from scratch

Trial conversion 2/10

Build custom workflow

0/10

Build everything from scratch

Revenue attribution 0/10

Not available

0/10

Not available

Pricing and operating cost

SendGrid

Free: 100 emails/day

Marketing Campaigns is a paid add-on Email validation costs extra Complex pricing with overages

Amazon SES

Free: 3,000 emails/month from EC2 (62,000 in free tier)

Dedicated IPs at $24.95/month each CloudWatch costs for monitoring SNS costs for event notifications Lambda costs for event processing Engineering time to build bounce handling, suppression, analytics, compliance Data transfer fees

Tier or usage case SendGrid Amazon SES
Starter $19.95/mo

100,000 emails, basic analytics

~$5/mo

$0.10/1,000 emails, no monthly fee

Growth $89.95/mo

500,000 emails, dedicated IP, phone support

~$50/mo

$0.10/1,000 + dedicated IP ($24.95/mo)

Scale / Enterprise $249.95+/mo

1M+, SLA, SSO, dedicated IP pool

~$100+/mo

$0.10/1,000, volume discounts, multiple dedicated IPs

Pros and cons

SendGrid

Pros

  • Managed deliverability (bounce handling, suppression, reputation)
  • Full marketing campaigns with builder and automation
  • Comprehensive analytics dashboard
  • Large integration ecosystem (100+)
  • Both SMTP and API support
  • Enterprise SLAs backed by Twilio
  • Faster setup than SES
  • Email validation add-on

Cons

  • Much more expensive per email than SES
  • API design feels dated
  • Marketing Campaigns is a paid add-on
  • Complex pricing with add-ons
  • Support quality reportedly declined
  • No SaaS-specific billing integration
  • No AWS-native integration
  • Dashboard can be slow and complex

Amazon SES

Pros

  • Lowest cost per email ($0.10/1,000)
  • Virtually unlimited scale
  • Native AWS integration (IAM, Lambda, CloudWatch)
  • Both API and SMTP
  • Dedicated IPs at $24.95/mo each
  • Global AWS infrastructure
  • Enterprise SLA backed by AWS
  • Inbound email receiving capability

Cons

  • Complex setup taking days
  • Must build bounce handling, suppression, compliance yourself
  • SNS events are much harder than webhooks
  • Sandbox restrictions delay getting started
  • Risk of account suspension for high bounce/complaint rates
  • No visual dashboard
  • No marketing features
  • No lifecycle, automation, or SaaS-specific features

Who should choose what?

Startup needing email fast.

Recommendation: Amazon SES

Sending 5M+ emails monthly on AWS, cost is the priority.

Recommendation: Amazon SES

Want a managed platform with both capabilities.

Recommendation: SendGrid

Self-serve signups with billing-aware lifecycle email.

Recommendation: Amazon SES

Sending 100K emails/month and want low cost with some management.

Recommendation: Amazon SES

Large organization fully on AWS wanting native integration.

Recommendation: Amazon SES

Final verdict

[object Object]

FAQ

How much cheaper is SES than SendGrid?

SES is roughly 5-10x cheaper on per-email cost. At 500K emails/month: SES costs ~$50, SendGrid costs ~$250. But SES requires significant engineering to build bounce handling, suppression, analytics, and compliance that SendGrid includes.

Is SendGrid built on SES?

No. SendGrid has its own infrastructure. Some smaller email platforms do use SES as a backend, but SendGrid predates SES and operates independently.

Can SES suspend my account?

Yes. If bounce rate exceeds 5% or complaint rate exceeds 0.1%, AWS will review and potentially suspend sending. SendGrid manages this for you with automatic suppression. This is a real operational risk with SES.

Which should I choose for a new SaaS project?

For most new SaaS projects, a managed platform (SendGrid, Resend, or Sequenzy) is better than raw SES. The engineering time saved pays for the higher per-email cost many times over. SES makes sense if you are already on AWS and send millions of emails where cost savings are substantial.

Does SendGrid offer better deliverability than SES?

Generally yes, because SendGrid actively manages IP reputation and provides automatic bounce handling. With SES, deliverability depends entirely on your own management. Dedicated IPs help on both platforms.

Related reading: B2B email marketing guide , alternatives hub , and B2B SaaS tool stack .